PP10 · Professional Performance
Surgical Performance Assessment
Can your surgical team maintain the level of attention and performance a complex operation demands from beginning to end?
Research protocolSurgical Performance Assessment
Can your surgical team maintain the level of attention and performance a complex operation demands from beginning to end?
Professional PerformanceEye Tracking GlassesEye Tracking VREEGSurgerySurgeon
FIELDProfessional Performance
EXECUTIONIn-person execution
TECHNOLOGY PATHEye Tracking Glasses · Eye Tracking VR · EEG
STUDY CODEPP10
The research question
Can your surgical team maintain the level of attention and performance a complex operation demands from beginning to end?
Surgical Performance Assessment focuses on the doctors whose performance is critical during complex operations, measuring sustained attention, situational awareness, visual strategy, cognitive load and performance stability across the procedure.
Real operating roomSurgical simulatorVR
Technology configuration
Measurement follows the task.
The technology path shown here is the approved structure for this service. The exact protocol is configured around the research question, environment and participant flow.
Real surgical procedure or selected surgical phase.
Simulation / immersive assessment.
Typical protocol · Professional Performance
How this study is executed.
The protocol below reflects the service definition developed for Neuro Garage. Final details are confirmed before execution.
Define the complex procedure or critical surgical phase and its information / decision demands.
Observe the relevant medical professionals in the real operating room or execute an approved simulation / VR protocol.
Capture sustained attention, visual sequence, critical-information detection, decision timing and workload throughout the task.
Identify attention losses, high-load moments, omissions, procedural bottlenecks and performance deterioration over time.
Translate the evidence into credentialing, training, protocol and operating-room design decisions.
Typical outputs
What this specific study can produce.
01Attention distribution
02Critical structures detected / missed
03Visual scan strategy
04Fixation on critical areas
05Attention shifts
06Cognitive workload
07Decision latency
08Performance degradation over time
09High-load surgical moments
10Errors and omissions
11Procedural bottlenecks
Decisions supported
What the client can change with the evidence.
The study is designed to translate observed behavior into concrete operational, people, design or risk-management decisions.
Industry references / comparable applications
Who has used comparable research approaches?
Publicly documented examples from companies and institutions worldwide. These organizations are not presented as Neuro Garage clients, and the examples do not imply they purchased this exact Neuro Garage protocol.
01
OHB SwedenPublic precedent
Mission-control operator study examining cognitive load, visual behavior, task familiarity and interface use.
View public source ↗02NASA Langley Research CenterPublic precedent
Human-performance and attention research with commercial aviation pilots using eye tracking and psychophysiological measures.
View public source ↗03DensoPublic precedent
Expert-vs-novice visual-performance research used to improve inspection accuracy and training.
View public source ↗Scientific configuration
The method follows the question.
Technology is selected because it is scientifically appropriate for the research objective, not because a device must be used. Santiago configures the study scope, stimuli, participant flow and measurement path before execution.
Discuss this study