Spot Tester
Which spot captures more attention, generates a stronger observed emotional response, and gives the campaign message more impact?
Every protocol is configured to the objective, sample and measurement environment.

Which spot captures more attention, generates a stronger observed emotional response, and gives the campaign message more impact?
From a research question to actionable evidence.
Spot Tester evaluates alternative political audiovisual pieces scene by scene, combining visual-attention and facial-expression measurement to show what is seen, when attention rises or falls, and how observable emotional response changes across the content. Results are descriptive and are not used to predict voting behavior or target individuals.
Which spot captures more attention, generates a stronger observed emotional response, and gives the campaign message more impact?
Spot Tester evaluates alternative political audiovisual pieces scene by scene, combining visual-attention and facial-expression measurement to show what is seen, when attention rises or falls, and how observable emotional response changes across the content. Results are descriptive and are not used to predict voting behavior or target individuals.
Measurement follows the task
The technology path shown here is the approved structure for this service. The exact protocol is configured around the research question, environment and participant flow.
How this study is executed.
The protocol below reflects the service definition developed for Neuro Garage. Final details are confirmed before execution.
Define the spot versions, scenes and critical visual / message elements to be evaluated.
Expose the target sample through the approved online or laboratory protocol.
Synchronize visual attention with facially expressed emotional response across the complete spot timeline.
Identify attention peaks, attention loss, emotional-response peaks / drops, candidate visibility, message visibility and overlooked elements.
Report the observed differences between versions without converting the results into voter targeting or electoral prediction.
What the research delivers
Observe. Measure. Decide.
The deliverables depend on the approved study protocol. The examples below are categories of outputs and potential decisions, not fabricated participant data or promised findings.
Appropriate instrumentation
Online Eye Tracking
Online FaceCoding
Eye Tracking Bar
Protocol-based metrics
Attention Timeline
Emotion Timeline
Heatmaps
Decisions supported
Compare alternative spot versions by observed-response metrics
Review whether key campaign elements are actually seen
Locate scenes with attention loss
Measurement outputs and interpretation must follow data-quality checks and the actual scientific protocol. No sample findings are represented here.
What the client can change with the evidence
The study is designed to translate observed behavior into concrete operational, people, design or risk-management decisions.
Who has used comparable research approaches?
Publicly documented examples from companies and institutions worldwide. These organizations are not presented as Neuro Garage clients, and the examples do not imply they purchased this exact Neuro Garage protocol.
Copenhagen PR bureau evaluated election posters with eye tracking, facial-expression analysis and GSR.
View public source ↗02Publicly documented advertising-attention research using eye tracking; comparable methodology for creative testing, though not a political campaign study.
View public source ↗03Publicly documented TV-advertising eye-tracking research; comparable ad-attention methodology, not evidence of a political-campaign engagement.
View public source ↗Define the right study, not just the equipment.
Tell us your research question. We will discuss the sample, measurement setting, technologies and reporting requirements before confirming the scope.
