MI05 · Military Industry
Military Situational Awareness Metrics
Can personnel perceive, understand and anticipate what is happening as the operational situation changes?
Situational awareness measured from detection through anticipation.
Situational awareness measured from detection through anticipation.Military Situational Awareness Metrics
Can personnel perceive, understand and anticipate what is happening as the operational situation changes?
Military IndustryEye Tracking GlassesEye Tracking VREEG optional in advanced VRSituational AwarenessMilitary
FIELDMilitary Industry
EXECUTIONIn-person execution
TECHNOLOGY PATHEye Tracking Glasses · Eye Tracking VR · EEG optional in advanced VR · GSR optional
STUDY CODEMI05
The research question
Can personnel perceive, understand and anticipate what is happening as the operational situation changes?
Military Situational Awareness Metrics measures whether personnel detect relevant threats and cues, understand their meaning and anticipate how the situation is likely to evolve. The protocol can introduce multiple threats, distractors and unexpected changes to identify where situational awareness degrades.
Real operational environmentTraining environmentSimulatorVR
Technology configuration
Measurement follows the task
The technology path shown here is the approved structure for this service. The exact protocol is configured around the research question, environment and participant flow.
Added when the protocol requires physiological activation / stress measurement.
Typical protocol · Military Industry
How this study is executed.
The protocol below reflects the service definition developed for Neuro Garage. Final details are confirmed before execution.
Define the relevant threats, cues, distractors and expected situational changes.
Execute the real, training, simulator or VR scenario.
Measure visual coverage, detection timing, prioritization and response to evolving information.
Introduce approved multiple-threat, distractor and unexpected-change conditions.
Identify detection failures, ignored zones, loss of situational awareness and failures to anticipate the next operational development.
Typical outputs
What this specific study can produce
01Threats detected / not detected
02Time to threat / cue detection
03Visual coverage
04Ignored elements
05Information prioritization
06Situational-awareness loss
07Anticipation of situation evolution
08Response to multiple threats
09Response to distractors
10Response to unexpected changes
Decisions supported
What the client can change with the evidence
The study is designed to translate observed behavior into concrete operational, people, design or risk-management decisions.
Industry references / comparable applications
Who has used comparable research approaches?
Publicly documented examples from companies and institutions worldwide. These organizations are not presented as Neuro Garage clients, and the examples do not imply they purchased this exact Neuro Garage protocol.
01
U.S. active-duty service-member researchPublic precedent
Published work used eye tracking and EEG to examine situational awareness during virtual navigation under cognitive load.
View public source ↗02NASA Langley Research CenterPublic precedent
Operator-state and human-performance research using eye tracking and psychophysiological measures in aviation contexts.
View public source ↗03OHB SwedenPublic precedent
Mission-control research on workload, visual behavior, task familiarity and interface use in satellite operations.
View public source ↗Scientific configuration
The method follows the question
Technology is selected because it is scientifically appropriate for the research objective, not because a device must be used. Santiago configures the study scope, stimuli, participant flow and measurement path before execution.
Discuss this study