MI04 · Military Industry
Command & Control Attention Metrics
Does your command-and-control team see, prioritize and act on the information that matters before it is too late?
Attention across command, control, alarms and information flow.
Attention across command, control, alarms and information flow.Command & Control Attention Metrics
Does your command-and-control team see, prioritize and act on the information that matters before it is too late?
Military IndustryEye Tracking GlassesEye Tracking VREEG optional in advanced VRCommandControl
FIELDMilitary Industry
EXECUTIONIn-person execution
TECHNOLOGY PATHEye Tracking Glasses · Eye Tracking VR · EEG optional in advanced VR · GSR optional
STUDY CODEMI04
The research question
Does your command-and-control team see, prioritize and act on the information that matters before it is too late?
Command & Control Attention Metrics measures how personnel distribute attention across screens, maps, alarms, signals, feeds and other information sources in command-and-control environments. It identifies missed alerts, delayed detection, divided-attention failures, overload and incorrect prioritization during both routine and escalating situations.
Real command roomSimulatorVR
Technology configuration
Measurement follows the task
The technology path shown here is the approved structure for this service. The exact protocol is configured around the research question, environment and participant flow.
Added when the protocol requires physiological activation / stress measurement.
Typical protocol · Military Industry
How this study is executed.
The protocol below reflects the service definition developed for Neuro Garage. Final details are confirmed before execution.
Map all critical screens, alerts, signals and information sources.
Run the real, simulated or immersive command-and-control scenario.
Measure visual sequence, detection timing, dwell, switching, divided attention and information prioritization.
Introduce approved unexpected events or threat escalation when required by the protocol.
Identify missed alarms, ignored zones, overload and prioritization failures, then translate them into system and procedure improvements.
Typical outputs
What this specific study can produce
01Alarms / signals not seen
02Time to detection
03Visual sequence
04Dwell time
05Ignored elements
06Changes in priority
07Cognitive / attentional overload
08Multitasking performance
09Divided attention
10Response to unexpected events
11Response to threat escalation
Decisions supported
What the client can change with the evidence
The study is designed to translate observed behavior into concrete operational, people, design or risk-management decisions.
Industry references / comparable applications
Who has used comparable research approaches?
Publicly documented examples from companies and institutions worldwide. These organizations are not presented as Neuro Garage clients, and the examples do not imply they purchased this exact Neuro Garage protocol.
01
U.S. active-duty service-member researchPublic precedent
Published work used eye tracking and EEG to examine situational awareness during virtual navigation under cognitive load.
View public source ↗02NASA Langley Research CenterPublic precedent
Operator-state and human-performance research using eye tracking and psychophysiological measures in aviation contexts.
View public source ↗03OHB SwedenPublic precedent
Mission-control research on workload, visual behavior, task familiarity and interface use in satellite operations.
View public source ↗Scientific configuration
The method follows the question
Technology is selected because it is scientifically appropriate for the research objective, not because a device must be used. Santiago configures the study scope, stimuli, participant flow and measurement path before execution.
Discuss this study